Review



anti csf1r  (Bio X Cell)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio X Cell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio X Cell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Bio X Cell anti csf1r
    Anti Csf1r, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 214 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti csf1r/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 214 article reviews
    anti csf1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Bio X Cell anti csf1r
    Anti Csf1r, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti csf1r/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti csf1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell anti cs1fr antibody
    Anti Cs1fr Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cs1fr antibody/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cs1fr antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell cd115 clone afs98
    Cd115 Clone Afs98, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd115 clone afs98/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd115 clone afs98 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell anti mouse csf1r
    a-e. Flow cytometry analysis the proportions of CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells of MC38 (n=13/12), B16 (n=13/13), ID8 (n=11/12) and LLC (n=13/13) tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. f-i. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportions of CD4 + IFN-γ + T cells and CD8 + IFN-γ + T cells in the MC38, B16, ID8 and LLC tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. j-l. The expression levels of IFN-γ in the tumor culture supernatant and mouse serum of MC38, LLC, B16 and ID8 tumor-bearing mice after control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment were detected via ELISA. m. MC38 tumors were subcutaneously implanted into hCD209-KI mice, followed by anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCD8 or anti-hCD209+αCD8 treatment (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( m ). The depletion of CD8+ T cells is shown ( n ). o-q. Tumors were implanted as described in m , followed by treatment with anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCSF1R or anti-hCD209+αCSF1R (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( o ). The depletion of <t>CSF1R</t> + cells is shown ( p-q ). *: P<0.05; **: P<0.01; ***: P<0.005; ****: P<0.001 based on two-tailed unpaired t tests ( b-l, n, p and q ); Two-way ANOVA ( m and o ); All error bars represent the S.E.M. of technical replicates. Data are representative of two independent experiments ( a-q ).
    Anti Mouse Csf1r, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse csf1r/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse csf1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell invivomab anti mouse csf1r cd115
    a-e. Flow cytometry analysis the proportions of CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells of MC38 (n=13/12), B16 (n=13/13), ID8 (n=11/12) and LLC (n=13/13) tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. f-i. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportions of CD4 + IFN-γ + T cells and CD8 + IFN-γ + T cells in the MC38, B16, ID8 and LLC tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. j-l. The expression levels of IFN-γ in the tumor culture supernatant and mouse serum of MC38, LLC, B16 and ID8 tumor-bearing mice after control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment were detected via ELISA. m. MC38 tumors were subcutaneously implanted into hCD209-KI mice, followed by anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCD8 or anti-hCD209+αCD8 treatment (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( m ). The depletion of CD8+ T cells is shown ( n ). o-q. Tumors were implanted as described in m , followed by treatment with anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCSF1R or anti-hCD209+αCSF1R (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( o ). The depletion of <t>CSF1R</t> + cells is shown ( p-q ). *: P<0.05; **: P<0.01; ***: P<0.005; ****: P<0.001 based on two-tailed unpaired t tests ( b-l, n, p and q ); Two-way ANOVA ( m and o ); All error bars represent the S.E.M. of technical replicates. Data are representative of two independent experiments ( a-q ).
    Invivomab Anti Mouse Csf1r Cd115, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/invivomab anti mouse csf1r cd115/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    invivomab anti mouse csf1r cd115 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio X Cell anti cd115
    (A) Diagram of treatment schedule for delayed tolerance protocol. BALB/c donors are treated with two doses of 500 <t>μg</t> <t>anti-CD115</t> antibody intraperitoneally (i.p.) as described in Methods. Donor macrophage-depleted (DMac-Depleted) or non-depleted (Control) islets are transplanted on day 0 into diabetic C57BL/6 mice. Recipients are then treated with two doses of donor ECDI-SPs on POD+1 and POD+7. (B) Representative FACS plots depicting gating strategy to count pancreatic islet macrophages. BALB/c donors received two doses of 500 μg intraperitoneal anti-CD115 antibody on days-11 and -7 prior to islet isolation on day0. Islets were harvested and immediately dissociated before staining for flow cytometry. Two donors were pooled for each data point, and the number of macrophages was normalized to the number of donors. The bar graph depicts the average number of donor islet macrophages (DMac) per donor, N=4 for each group. (C) Blood glucose was tracked to determine graft function, with two consecutive days of blood glucose >250 mg/dL defined as graft rejection. Survival of grafts with each treatment regimen is represented in the survival plot as days post-transplant, significance *p < 0.05. ***p < .005.
    Anti Cd115, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd115/product/Bio X Cell
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd115 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a-e. Flow cytometry analysis the proportions of CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells of MC38 (n=13/12), B16 (n=13/13), ID8 (n=11/12) and LLC (n=13/13) tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. f-i. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportions of CD4 + IFN-γ + T cells and CD8 + IFN-γ + T cells in the MC38, B16, ID8 and LLC tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. j-l. The expression levels of IFN-γ in the tumor culture supernatant and mouse serum of MC38, LLC, B16 and ID8 tumor-bearing mice after control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment were detected via ELISA. m. MC38 tumors were subcutaneously implanted into hCD209-KI mice, followed by anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCD8 or anti-hCD209+αCD8 treatment (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( m ). The depletion of CD8+ T cells is shown ( n ). o-q. Tumors were implanted as described in m , followed by treatment with anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCSF1R or anti-hCD209+αCSF1R (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( o ). The depletion of CSF1R + cells is shown ( p-q ). *: P<0.05; **: P<0.01; ***: P<0.005; ****: P<0.001 based on two-tailed unpaired t tests ( b-l, n, p and q ); Two-way ANOVA ( m and o ); All error bars represent the S.E.M. of technical replicates. Data are representative of two independent experiments ( a-q ).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Myeloid CD209 impairs T-cell activation by inducing ICAM-2–ERM–dependent cortical stiffening

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.19.699861

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a-e. Flow cytometry analysis the proportions of CD4 + T and CD8 + T cells of MC38 (n=13/12), B16 (n=13/13), ID8 (n=11/12) and LLC (n=13/13) tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. f-i. Flow cytometry analysis of the proportions of CD4 + IFN-γ + T cells and CD8 + IFN-γ + T cells in the MC38, B16, ID8 and LLC tumor microenvironments following control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment. j-l. The expression levels of IFN-γ in the tumor culture supernatant and mouse serum of MC38, LLC, B16 and ID8 tumor-bearing mice after control mAb or anti-hCD209 mAb treatment were detected via ELISA. m. MC38 tumors were subcutaneously implanted into hCD209-KI mice, followed by anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCD8 or anti-hCD209+αCD8 treatment (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( m ). The depletion of CD8+ T cells is shown ( n ). o-q. Tumors were implanted as described in m , followed by treatment with anti-control, anti-hCD209 mAb, anti-control+αCSF1R or anti-hCD209+αCSF1R (n=12/12/12/12), and tumor growth is shown ( o ). The depletion of CSF1R + cells is shown ( p-q ). *: P<0.05; **: P<0.01; ***: P<0.005; ****: P<0.001 based on two-tailed unpaired t tests ( b-l, n, p and q ); Two-way ANOVA ( m and o ); All error bars represent the S.E.M. of technical replicates. Data are representative of two independent experiments ( a-q ).

    Article Snippet: The human IgG4 isotype control (clone R1, (Selleck Cat# A2052, RRID: AB_3713065)), anti-mouse PD-1 (clone RMP1-14, (Selleck Cat# A2122, RRID:AB_3644244)), anti-mouse CD8a (clone 2.43, (Selleck Cat# A2102, RRID:AB_3099521)), and anti-mouse CSF1R (clone AFS98, (Bio X Cell Cat# BE0213, RRID:AB_2687699)).

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Two Tailed Test

    (A) Diagram of treatment schedule for delayed tolerance protocol. BALB/c donors are treated with two doses of 500 μg anti-CD115 antibody intraperitoneally (i.p.) as described in Methods. Donor macrophage-depleted (DMac-Depleted) or non-depleted (Control) islets are transplanted on day 0 into diabetic C57BL/6 mice. Recipients are then treated with two doses of donor ECDI-SPs on POD+1 and POD+7. (B) Representative FACS plots depicting gating strategy to count pancreatic islet macrophages. BALB/c donors received two doses of 500 μg intraperitoneal anti-CD115 antibody on days-11 and -7 prior to islet isolation on day0. Islets were harvested and immediately dissociated before staining for flow cytometry. Two donors were pooled for each data point, and the number of macrophages was normalized to the number of donors. The bar graph depicts the average number of donor islet macrophages (DMac) per donor, N=4 for each group. (C) Blood glucose was tracked to determine graft function, with two consecutive days of blood glucose >250 mg/dL defined as graft rejection. Survival of grafts with each treatment regimen is represented in the survival plot as days post-transplant, significance *p < 0.05. ***p < .005.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Donor Macrophage Depletion Permits Post-Transplant Tolerance Induction in a Murine Islet Transplant Model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.01.08.698403

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Diagram of treatment schedule for delayed tolerance protocol. BALB/c donors are treated with two doses of 500 μg anti-CD115 antibody intraperitoneally (i.p.) as described in Methods. Donor macrophage-depleted (DMac-Depleted) or non-depleted (Control) islets are transplanted on day 0 into diabetic C57BL/6 mice. Recipients are then treated with two doses of donor ECDI-SPs on POD+1 and POD+7. (B) Representative FACS plots depicting gating strategy to count pancreatic islet macrophages. BALB/c donors received two doses of 500 μg intraperitoneal anti-CD115 antibody on days-11 and -7 prior to islet isolation on day0. Islets were harvested and immediately dissociated before staining for flow cytometry. Two donors were pooled for each data point, and the number of macrophages was normalized to the number of donors. The bar graph depicts the average number of donor islet macrophages (DMac) per donor, N=4 for each group. (C) Blood glucose was tracked to determine graft function, with two consecutive days of blood glucose >250 mg/dL defined as graft rejection. Survival of grafts with each treatment regimen is represented in the survival plot as days post-transplant, significance *p < 0.05. ***p < .005.

    Article Snippet: Donor BALB/c mice were treated with anti-CD115 (anti-CSF1R, BioXCell #BE0213) antibody to deplete pancreatic islet resident macrophages.

    Techniques: Control, Isolation, Staining, Flow Cytometry